ARGUMENT 1

可橙 发表于 2008-08-26 16:31:57

4.The following was posted on an Internet real estate discussion site.

 

"Of the two leading real estate firms in our town-Adams Realty and Fitch Realty-Adams is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents. In contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch, and included home sales that averaged 8,000, compared to Fitch's 4,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago, I listed my home with Fitch and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams."

 

 

 

The conclusion of the argument, Adams Realty is superior to Fitch Realty, is judged by the estate agents, the revenue of last year, the averaged price and the compare of arguer’s two experiences on listing with the two companies, what is a compare between ten years. So arguer thinks “if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams.” All of the data seems to confirm that Adams Realty is superior, but a close review indicates that this argument suffers from several critical logical fallacies.

Fist of all, Adams has 40 real estate agents, Fitch has just 25, and many of them are only part-time. But this is unrelated to conclude that which is better. Fitch’s staffs are part-work, but their other works may relate to the home selling, and that may broad their ways to hunt for their clients and get more experience. It’s not the shortage but the predominance for Fitch.

The second, Adams is better than Fitch from the revenue of last year and the average price. If Adams is major on listing high end house, but Fitch is major on listing medium and low end house. This is a very reason of why Adams’ average price is higher than Fitch. In that town, people are prefer high end house than medium and low end house, or maybe it’s happen to that people more need high end house last year, or even more many rich men imitate last year.

IT is not obeying the right logic that the writer judge the speed of selling house by comparing now with ten years ago. As the developing of economy, people’s life is changed, it is better and better, improved a lot. It’s obvious to see that people can easy buy a house now, so the speed of selling house is more and more fast. And there may some occasion reasons make it to sell faster.

In summary, arguer’s logic is lack of convincing support. Only in a same time and a long time to watch and then compare, there will be a impartial conclusion to say whether Adams is superior than Fitch. 

关键词(Tag): gre argument


收藏: QQ书签 del.icio.us 订阅: Google 抓虾

最新评论

发表评论

* 昵称

已经注册过? 请登录

新用户请先注册 以便能显示头像及追踪评论回复

Email
网址
* 评论
表情
 
 

分类小组论坛
杂谈, 娱乐、八卦, 文学、艺术, 体育, 旅游、同城, 象牙塔, 情感, 时尚、生活, 星座, 科技

请注意遵守中华人民共和国法律法规, 如威胁到本站生存, 将依法向有关部门报告, 同时本站的相关记录可能成为对您不利的证据.

相关法律法规
全国人大常委会关于维护互联网安全的决定
中华人民共和国计算机信息系统安全保护条例
中华人民共和国计算机信息网络国际联网管理暂行规定
计算机信息网络国际联网安全保护管理办法
计算机信息系统国际联网保密管理规定